劍橋雅思閱讀5原文翻譯及答案(test1)
雅思閱讀是塊難啃的硬骨頭，需要我們做更多的題目才能得心應手。下面小編給大家分享一下劍橋雅思閱讀5test1原文翻譯及答案解析，希望可以幫助到大家。
劍橋雅思閱讀5原文(test1)
劍橋雅思系列真題是劍橋大學考試委員會外語考試部出版各類考試真題的唯一官方出版社出版的權威教材，書中包含最新的雅思全真試題資料，是各類雅思考生備考過程中必不可少的參考書。非常適合學生自學的習題解答和聽力錄音文本。
READING PASSAGE 1
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based on Reading Passage 1 below.
Johnson’s Dictionary
For the century before Johnson’s Dictionary was published in 1775, there had been concern about the state of the English language. There was no standard way of speaking or writing and no agreement as to the best way of bringing some order to the chaos of English spelling. Dr Johnson provided the solution.
There had, of course, been dictionaries in the past, the first of these being a little book of some 120 pages, compiled by a certain Robert Cawdray, published in 1604 under the title A Table Alphabeticall ‘of hard usuall English wordes’. Like the various dictionaries that came after it during the seventeenth century, Cawdray’s tended to concentrate on ‘scholarly’ words; one function of the dictionary was to enable its student to convey an impression of fine learning.
Beyond the practical need to make order out of chaos, the rise of dictionaries is associated with the rise of the English middle class, who were anxious to define and circumscribe the various worlds to conquer — lexical as well as social and commercial. it is highly appropriate that Dr Samuel Johnson, the very model of an eighteenth-century literary man, as famous in his own time as in ours, should have published his Dictionary at the very beginning of the heyday of the middle class.
Johnson was a poet and critic who raised common sense to the heights of genius. His approach to the problems that had worried writers throughout the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries was intensely practical. Up until his time, the task of producing a dictionary on such a large scale had seemed impossible without the establishment of an academy to make decisions about right and wrong usage. Johnson decided he did not need an academy to settle arguments about language; he would write a dictionary himself and he would do it single-handed. Johnson signed the contract for the Dictionary with the bookseller Robert Dosley at a breakfast held at the Golden Anchor Inn near Holbom Bar on 18 June 1764.He was to be paid ￡1.575 in instalments, and from this he took money to rent Gough Square, in which he set up his ‘dictionary workshop’.
James Boswell, his biographer, described the garret where Johnson worked as ‘fitted up like a counting house’ with a long desk running down the middle at which the copying clerks would work standing up. Johnson himself was stationed on a rickety chair at an ‘old crazy deal table’ surrounded by a chaos of borrowed books. He was also helped by six assistants, two of whom died whilst the Dictionary was still in preparation.
The work was immense; filling about eighty large notebooks (and without a library to hand), Johnson wrote the definitions of over 40,000 words, and illustrated their many meanings with some 114,000 quotations drawn from English writing on every subject, from the Elizabethans to his own time. He did not expect to achieve complete originality. Working to a deadline, he had to draw on the best of all previous dictionaries, and to make his work one of heroic synthesis. In fact, it was very much more. Unlike his predecessors, Johnson treated English very practically, as a living language, with many different shades of meaning. He adopted his definitions on the principle of English common law — according to precedent. After its publication, his Dictionary was not seriously rivalled for over a century.
After many vicissitudes the Dictionary was finally published on 15 April 1775. It was instantly recognised as a landmark throughout Europe. ‘This very noble work,’ wrote the leading Italian lexicographer, ‘will be a perpetual monument of Fame to the Author, an Honour to his own Country in particular, and a general Benefit to the republic of Letters throughout Europe" The fact that Johnson had taken on the Academies of Europe and matched them (everyone knew that forty French academics had taken forty years to produce the first French national dictionary) was cause for much English celebration.
Johnson had worked for nine years, ‘with little assistance of the learned, and without any patronage of the great; not in the soft obscurities of retirement, or under the shelter of academic bowers, but amidst inconvenience and distraction, in sickness and in sorrow’. For all its faults and eccentricities his two-volume work is a masterpiece and a landmark, in his own words, ‘setting the orthography, displaying the analogy, regulating the structures, and ascertaining the significations of English words’. It is the cornerstone of Standard English an achievement which, in James Boswell’s words ‘conferred stability on the language of his country.’
The Dictionary, together with his other writing, made Johnson famous and so well esteemed that his friends were able to prevail upon King George Ⅲ to offer him a pension. From then on, he was to become the Johnson of folklore.
Questions 1-3
Choose THREE letters A-H.
Write your answers in boxes 1-3 on your answer sheet.
NB Your answers may be given in any order.
Which THREE of the following statements are true of Johnson’s Dictionary?
A It avoided all scholarly words.
B It was the only English dictionary in general use for 200 years.
C It was famous because of the large number of people involved.
D It focused mainly on language from contemporary texts.
E There was a time limit for its completion.
F It ignored work done by previous dictionary writers.
G It took into account subtleties of meaning.
H Its definitions were famous for their originality.
Questions 4-7
Complete the summary.
Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer.
Write your answers in boxes 4-7 on your answer sheet.
In 1764 Dr Johnson accepted the contract to produce a dictionary. Having rented a garret, he took on a number of 4…………, who stood at a long central desk. Johnson did not have a 5………… available to him, but eventually produced definitions of in excess of 40,000 words written down in 80 large notebooks. On publications, the Dictionary was immediately hailed in many European countries as a landmark. According to his biographer, James Boswell, Johnson’s principal achievement was to bring 6……… to the English language. As a reward for his hard work, he was granted a 7………by the king.
Questions 8-13
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?
In boxes 8-13 on your answer sheet, write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this
8 The growing importance of the middle classes led to an increased demand for dictionaries.
9 Johnson has become more well known since his death.
10 Johnson had been planning to write a dictionary for several years.
11 Johnson set up an academy to help with the writing of his Dictionary.
12 Johnson only received payment for his Dictionary on its completion.
13 Not all of the assistants survived to see the publication of the Dictionary.
READING PASSAGE 2
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 14-26, which are based on Reading Passage 2 below.
Nature or Nurture?
A A few years ago, in one of the most fascinating and disturbing experiments in behavioural psychology, Stanley Milgram of Yale University tested 40 subjects from all walks of life for their willingness to obey instructions given by a ‘leader’ in a situation in which the subjects might feel a personal distaste for the actions they were called upon to perform. Specifically Milgram told each volunteer ‘teacher-subject’ that the experiment was in the noble cause of education, and was designed to test whether or not punishing pupils for their mistakes would have a positive effect on the pupils’ ability to learn.
B Milgram’s experimental set-up involved placing the teacher-subject before a panel of thirty switches with labels ranging from ‘15 volts of electricity (slight shock)’ to ‘450 volts (danger — severe shock)’ in steps of 15 volts each. The teacher-subject was told that whenever the pupil gave the wrong answer to a question, a shock was to be administered, beginning at the lowest level and increasing in severity with each successive wrong answer. The supposed ‘pupil’ was in reality an actor hired by Milgram to simulate receiving the shocks by emitting a spectrum of groans, screams and writings together with an assortment of statements and expletives denouncing both the experiment and the experimenter. Milgram told the teacher-subject to ignore the reactions of the pupil, and to administer whatever level of shock was called for, as per the rule governing the experimental situation of the moment.
C As the experiment unfolded, the pupil would deliberately give the wrong answers to questions posed by the teacher, thereby bringing on various electrical punishments, even up to the danger level of 300 volts and beyond. Many of the teacher-subjects balked at administering the higher levels of punishment, and turned to Milgram with questioning looks and/or complaints about continuing the experiment. In these situations, Milgram calmly explained that the teacher-subject was to ignore the pupil’s cries for mercy and carry on with the experiment. If the subject was still reluctant to proceed, Milgram said that it was important for the sake of the experiment that the procedure be followed through to the end. His final argument was ‘you have no other choice. You must go on’. What Milgram was trying to discover was the number of teacher-subjects who would be willing to administer the highest levels of shock, even in the face of strong personal and moral revulsion against the rules and conditions of the experiment.
D Prior to carrying out the experiment, Milgram explained his idea to a group of 39 psychiatrists and asked them to predict the average percentage of people in an ordinary population who would be willing to administer the highest shock level of 450 volts. The overwhelming consensus was that virtually all the teacher-subjects would refuse to obey the experimenter. The psychiatrists felt that ‘most subjects would not go beyond 150 volts’ and they further anticipated that only four per cent would go up to 300 volts. Furthermore, they thought that only a lunatic fringe of about one in 1,000 would give the highest shock of 450 volts.
E What were the actual results? Well, over 60 per cent of the teacher-subjects continued to obey Milgram up to the 450-volt limit in repetitions of the experiment in other countries, the percentage of obedient teacher-subjects was even higher, reaching 85 per cent in one country. How can we possibly account for this vast discrepancy between what calm, rational, knowledgeable people predict in the comfort of their study and what pressured, flustered, but cooperative ‘teachers’ actually do in the laboratory of real life?
F One’s first inclination might be to argue that there must be some sort of built-in animal aggression instinct that was activated by the experiment, and that Milgram’s teache-subjects were just following a genetic need to discharge this pent-up primal urge onto the pupil by administering the electrical shock. A modern hard-core sociobiologist might even go so far as to claim that this aggressive instinct evolved as an advantageous trait, having been of survival value to our ancestors in their struggle against the hardships of life on the plains and in the caves, ultimately finding its way into our genetic make-up as a remnant of our ancient animal ways.
G An alternative to this notion of genetic programming is to see the teacher-subjects’ actions as a result of the social environment under which the experiment was carried out. As Milgram himself pointed out, ‘Most subjects in the experiment see their behaviour in a larger context that is benevolent and useful to society — the pursuit of scientific truth. The psychological laboratory has a strong claim to legitimacy and evokes trust and confidence in those who perform there. An action such as shocking a victim, which in isolation appears evil, acquires a completely different meaning when placed in this setting.’
H Thus, in this explanation the subject merges his unique personality and personal and moral code with that of larger institutional structures, surrendering individual properties like loyalty, self-sacrifice and discipline to the service of malevolent systems of authority.
I Here we have two radically different explanations for why so many teacher-subjects were willing to forgo their sense of personal responsibility for the sake of an institutional authority figure. The problem for biologists, psychologists and anthropologists is to sort out which of these two polar explanations is more plausible. This, in essence, is the problem of modern sociobiology — to discover the degree to which hard-wired genetic programming dictates, or at least strongly biases, the interaction of animals and humans with their environment, that is, their behaviour. Put another way, sociobiology is concerned with elucidating the biological basis of all behaviour.
Questions 14-19
Reading Passage 2 has nine paragraphs, A-I.
Which paragraph contains the following information?
Write the correct letter A-I in boxes 14-19 on your answer sheet.
14 a biological explanation of the teacher-subjects’ behaviour
15 the explanation Milgram gave the teacher-subjects for the experiment
16 the identity of the pupils
17 the expected statistical outcome
18 the general aim of sociobiological study
19 the way Milgram persuaded the teacher-subjects to continue
Questions 20-22
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
Write your answers in boxes 20-22 on your answer sheet.
20 The teacher-subjects were told that were testing whether
A a 450-volt shock was dangerous.
B punishment helps learning.
C the pupils were honest.
D they were suited to teaching.
21 The teacher-subjects were instructed to
A stop when a pupil asked them to.
B denounce pupils who made mistakes.
C reduce the shock level after a correct answer.
D give punishment according to a rule.
22 Before the experiment took place the psychiatrists
A believed that a shock of 150 volts was too dangerous.
B failed to agree on how the teacher-subjects would respond to instructions.
C underestimated the teacher-subjects’ willingness to comply with experimental procedure.
D thought that many of the teacher-subjects would administer a shock of 450 volts.
Questions 23-26
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 2?
In boxes 23-26 on your answer sheet, write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this
23 Several of the subjects were psychology students at Yale University.
24 Some people may believe that the teacher-subjects’ behaviour could be explained as a positive survival mechanism.
25 In a sociological explanation, personal values are more powerful than authority.
26 Milgram’s experiment solves an important question in sociobiology.
READING PASSAGE 3
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40, which are based on Reading Passage 3 below.
The Truth about the Environment
For many environmentalists, the world seems to be getting worse. They have developed a hit-list of our main fears: that natural resources are running out; that the population is ever growing, leaving less and less to eat; that species are becoming extinct in vast numbers, and that the planet’s air and water are becoming ever more polluted.
But a quick look at the facts shows a different picture. First, energy and other natural resources have become more abundant, not less so, since the book ‘The Limits to Growth’ was published in 1972 by a group of scientists. Second, more food is now produced per head of the world’s population than at any time in history. Fewer people are starving. Third, although species are indeed becoming extinct, only about 0.7% of them are expected to disappear in the next 50 years, not 25-50%, as has so often been predicted. And finally, most forms of environmental pollution either appear to have been exaggerated, or are transient — associated with the early phases of industrialisation and therefore best cured not by restricting economic growth, but by accelerating it. One form of pollution — the release of greenhouse gases that causes global warming — does appear to be a phenomenon that is going to extend well into our future, but its total impact is unlikely to pose a devastating problem. A bigger problem may well turn out to be an inappropriate response to it.
Yet opinion polls suggest that many people nurture the belief that environmental standards are declining and four factors seem to cause this disjunction between perception and reality.
One is the lopsidedness built into scientific research. Scientific funding goes mainly to areas with many problems. That may be wise policy, but it will also create an impression that many more potential problems exist than is the case.
Secondly, environmental groups need to be noticed by the mass media. They also need to keep the money rolling in. Understandably, perhaps, they sometimes overstate their arguments. In 1997, for example, the World Wide Fund for Nature issued a press release entitled: ‘Two thirds of the world’s forests lost forever.’ The truth turns out to be nearer 20%.
Though these groups are run overwhelmingly by selfless folk, they nevertheless share many of the characteristics of other lobby groups. That would matter less if people applied the same degree of scepticism to environmental lobbying as they do to lobby groups in other fields. A trade organisation arguing for, say, weaker pollution controls is instantly seen as self-interested. Yet a green organisation opposing such a weakening is seen as altruistic, even if an impartial view of the controls in question might suggest they are doing more harm than good.
A third source of confusion is the attitude of the media. People are clearly more curious about bad news than good. Newspapers and broadcasters are there to provide what the public wants. That, however, can lead to significant distortions of perception. An example was America’s encounter with El Nino in 1997 and 1998. This climatic phenomenon was accused of wrecking tourism, causing allergies, melting the ski-slopes and causing 22 deaths. However, according to an article in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, the damage it did was estimated at US$4 billion but the benefits amounted to some US$19 billion. These came from higher winter temperatures (which saved an estimated 850 lives, reduced heating costs and diminished spring floods caused by meltwaters).
The fourth factor is poor individual perception. People worry that the endless rise in the amount of stuff everyone throws away will cause the world to run out of places to dispose of waste. Yet, even if America’s trash output continues to rise as it has done in the past, and even if the American population doubles by 2100, all the rubbish America produces through the entire 21st century will still take up only one-12,000th of the area of the entire United States.
So what of global warming? As we know, carbon dioxide emissions are causing the planet to warm. The best estimates are that the temperatures will rise by 2-3℃ in this century, causing considerable problems, at a total cost of US$5,000 billion.
Despite the intuition that something drastic needs to be done about such a costly problem, economic analyses clearly show it will be far more expensive to cut carbon dioxide emissions radically than to pay the costs of adaptation to the increased temperatures. A model by one of the main authors of the United Nations Climate Change Panel shows how an expected temperature increase of 2.1 degrees in 2100 would only be diminished to an increase of 1.9 degrees. Or to put it another way, the temperature increase that the planet would have experienced in 2094 would be postponed to 2100.
So this does not prevent global warming, but merely buys the world six years. Yet the cost of reducing carbon dioxide emissions, for the United States alone, will be higher than the cost of solving the world’s single, most pressing health problem: providing universal access to clean drinking water and sanitation. Such measures would avoid 2 million deaths every year, and prevent half a billion people from becoming seriously ill.
It is crucial that we look at the facts if we want to make the best possible decisions for the future. It may be costly to be overly optimistic — but more costly still to be too pessimistic.
Questions 27-32
Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in Reading Passage 3?
In boxes 27-32 on your answer sheet, write
YES if the statement agrees with the writer’s claims
NO if the statement contradicts the writer’s clams
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
27 Environmentalists take a pessimistic view of the world for a number of reasons
28 Data on the Earth’s natural resources has only been collected since 1972.
29 The number of starving people in the world has increased in recent years.
30 Extinct species are being replaced by new species.
31 Some pollution problems have been correctly linked to industrialisation.
32 It would be best to attempt to slow down economic growth.
Questions 33-37
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
Write your answers in boxes 33-37 on your answer sheet.
33 What aspect of scientific research does the writer express concern about in paragraph 4?
A the need to produce results
B the lack of financial support
C the selection of areas to research
D the desire to solve every research problem
34 The writer quotes from the Worldwide Fund for Nature to illustrate how
A influential the mass media can be.
B effective environmental groups can be.
C the mass media can help groups raise funds.
D environmental groups can exaggerate their claims.
34 What is the writer’s main point about lobby groups in paragraph 6?
A Some are more active than others.
B Some are better organised than others.
C Some receive more criticism than others.
D Some support more important issues than others.
35 The writer suggests that newspapers print items that are intended to
A educate readers.
B meet their readers’ expectations.
C encourage feedback from readers.
D mislead readers.
36 What does the writer say about America’s waste problem?
A It will increase in line with population growth.
B It is not as important as we have been led to believe.
C It has been reduced through public awareness of the issues.
D It is only significant in certain areas of the country.
Questions 38-40
Complete the summary with the list of words A-I below.
Write the correct letter A-I in boxes 38-40 on your answer sheet.
GLOBAL WARMING
The writer admits that global warming is a 38…………….challenge, but says that it will not have a catastrophic impact on our future, if we deal with it in the 39…………… way. If we try to reduce the levels of greenhouse gases, he believes that it would only have a minimal impact on rising temperatures. He feels it would be better to spend money on the more 40………… health problem of providing the world’s population with clean drinking water.
A unrealistic B agreed C expensive D right
E long-term F usual G surprising H personal
I urgent
劍橋雅思閱讀5原文參考譯文(test1)
TEST 1 PASSAGE 1參考譯文：
Johnson’s Dictionary
約翰遜博士的字典
For the century before Johnson’s Dictionary was published in 1775, there had been concern about the state of the English language. There was no standard way of speaking or writing and no agreement as to the best way of bringing some order to the chaos of English spelling. Dr Johnson provided the solution.
約翰遜博士的《字典》于1775年出版，在此之前的一個世紀，人們一直對英語的發(fā)展狀況擔憂?？谡Z和書面語沒有統(tǒng)一的標準，對于如何整頓英語拼寫混亂的局面也沒有統(tǒng)一的看法。正是約翰遜博士為這一問題提供了解決方案。
There had, of course, been dictionaries in the past, the first of these being a little book of some 120 pages, compiled by a certain Robert Cawdray, published in 1604 under the title A Table Alphabeticall ‘of hard usuall English wordes’. Like the various dictionaries that came after it during the seventeenth century, Cawdray’s tended to concentrate on ‘scholarly’ words; one function of the dictionary was to enable its student to convey an impression of fine learning.
當然，在此之前也有過一些字典《其中最早的是一本約120頁的小冊子，由一個叫Robert Cawdray的人編輯，于1604年出版，名為《按字母排序的罕見英語詞匯表》。正如后來17世紀出版的許多字典一樣，Cawdray傾向于著重收錄學術詞匯。這本字典的功能之一就是使字典的使用者能體現(xiàn)出良好的學術修養(yǎng)。
Beyond the practical need to make order out of chaos, the rise of dictionaries is associated with the rise of the English middle class, who were anxious to define and circumscribe the various worlds to conquer — lexical as well as social and commercial. it is highly appropriate that Dr Samuel Johnson, the very model of an eighteenth-century literary man, as famous in his own time as in ours, should have published his Dictionary at the very beginning of the heyday of the middle class.
除了規(guī)范英語混亂狀態(tài)的實際需要外，英語字典的興盛也與英國中產(chǎn)階級的興起有關。這些中產(chǎn)階級渴望對各種要征服的環(huán)境進行定義和約束，包括詞匯環(huán)境、社會環(huán)境和商業(yè)環(huán)境。塞繆爾?約翰遜博士作為18世紀文學家的典型代表，在當時和現(xiàn)在都享有盛譽，他在中產(chǎn)階級正如日中天之時出版他的《字典》真是再合“時”不過了。
Johnson was a poet and critic who raised common sense to the heights of genius. His approach to the problems that had worried writers throughout the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries was intensely practical. Up until his time, the task of producing a dictionary on such a large scale had seemed impossible without the establishment of an academy to make decisions about right and wrong usage. Johnson decided he did not need an academy to settle arguments about language; he would write a dictionary himself and he would do it single-handed. Johnson signed the contract for the Dictionary with the bookseller Robert Dosley at a breakfast held at the Golden Anchor Inn near Holbom Bar on 18 June 1764.He was to be paid ￡1.575 in instalments, and from this he took money to rent Gough Square, in which he set up his ‘dictionary workshop’.
約翰遜是詩人、批評家，他將常識提髙到了天賦的髙度。對于那些從17世紀晚期到18世紀早期一直困擾著作家的問題，約翰遜的解決方法是非常實用的。在約翰遜之前，如果沒有專門的學術機構判別正確與錯誤的用法，要出版這樣一部大型字典幾乎是不可能的。約翰遜則認為不需要學術機構來解決語言上的爭端，他要自己編一本字典，而且要自己親手去編。1764年6月18日，約翰遜與書商Robert Dosley在Holbom酒店附近的Golden Anchor旅店吃早餐時，簽訂了關于這本《字典》的合同。約翰遜因此獲得了總價值1575英鎊的分期付款，他從這些錢中拿出一些租下了17Gough廣場，在這里建起了自己的“字典作坊”。
James Boswell, his biographer, described the garret where Johnson worked as ‘fitted up like a counting house’ with a long desk running down the middle at which the copying clerks would work standing up. Johnson himself was stationed on a rickety chair at an ‘old crazy deal table’ surrounded by a chaos of borrowed books. He was also helped by six assistants, two of whom died whilst the Dictionary was still in preparation.
James Boswell曾為約翰遜作傳，他描述說約翰遜工作的閣樓就像“一個賬房”，中間有一張長長的的桌子，負責抄寫的工作人員站著工作。約翰遜坐在一把快要散架的椅子上，面前是一張老式的搖搖晃晃的文案桌，周圍亂七八糟堆放著一堆借來的書。同時旁邊有六個助手幫助，其中兩個在《字典》編纂的籌備階段就去世了。
The work was immense; filling about eighty large notebooks (and without a library to hand), Johnson wrote the definitions of over 40,000 words, and illustrated their many meanings with some 114,000 quotations drawn from English writing on every subject, from the Elizabethans to his own time. He did not expect to achieve complete originality. Working to a deadline, he had to draw on the best of all previous dictionaries, and to make his work one of heroic synthesis. In fact, it was very much more. Unlike his predecessors, Johnson treated English very practically, as a living language, with many different shades of meaning. He adopted his definitions on the principle of English common law — according to precedent. After its publication, his Dictionary was not seriously rivalled for over a century.
工作量是巨大的。當時，約翰遜在身邊還沒有圖書館可參閱的條件下，將80大本筆記進行了分類整理，撰寫了4萬多條詞的定義，并將這些詞的多個義項用約11.4萬條從各個學科的英語書面材料中摘出的引例加以佐證上些引例來源極廣，從伊麗莎白時代到當時作家的作品都被涵蓋在內(nèi)。約翰遜并沒有想進行完全的自我創(chuàng)作。由于有最后期限，他不得不吸收先前所有字典的精華之處，這就使他的工作成了一項規(guī)模宏大的整合工作。事實上，約翰遜所做的工作絕不僅限于此。和以前的字典編基者不同的是，約翰遜對待英語的態(tài)度十分務實。他將英語看成是活的語言，意思上有許多細微的差別。他對詞的定義采取英語普通法則：遵照先例。因此，約翰遜的《字典》出版后，在長達一個多世紀的時間里，都沒有出現(xiàn)一本真正能與其相媲美的字典。
After many vicissitudes the Dictionary was finally published on 15 April 1775. It was instantly recognised as a landmark throughout Europe. ‘This very noble work,’ wrote the leading Italian lexicographer, ‘will be a perpetual monument of Fame to the Author, an Honour to his own Country in particular, and a general Benefit to the republic of Letters throughout Europe" The fact that Johnson had taken on the Academies of Europe and matched them (everyone knew that forty French academics had taken forty years to produce the first French national dictionary) was cause for much English celebration.
幾經(jīng)周折后，約翰遜的這本《字典》終于在1775年4月15日出版了。一經(jīng)出版，這本字典就在整個歐洲獲得了一致認可，被譽為里程碑式的著作?一位意大利著名的辭書編築者寫道:“這項崇高的作品將成為其著者永恒的榮譽豐碑，也是其祖國的一項特別榮耀，這部作品惠及了整個歐洲大陸文學界?！北娝苤?，40個法國學者花了40年的時間才出版了第一部法語字典。而約翰遜一個人就承擔了一項歐洲學術界所做的工作并毫不遜色地把它完成，這一切都讓英國人引以為傲。
Johnson had worked for nine years, ‘with little assistance of the learned, and without any patronage of the great; not in the soft obscurities of retirement, or under the shelter of academic bowers, but amidst inconvenience and distraction, in sickness and in sorrow’. For all its faults and eccentricities his two-volume work is a masterpiece and a landmark, in his own words, ‘setting the orthography, displaying the analogy, regulating the structures, and ascertaining the significations of English words’. It is the cornerstone of Standard English an achievement which, in James Boswell’s words ‘conferred stability on the language of his country.’
約翰遜幾乎沒有得到學者的幫助或偉人的贊助，也沒有退休后的舒適條件，更不是在涼爽的書房中完成工作。他是在種.種不便與干擾中、在疾病折磨和憂傷中一直工作了九年。盡管存在瑕疵和怪異之處，他的這部兩卷本的著作仍然稱得上是一部杰作，一座里程碑。用他自己的話說，這本字典“規(guī)范了拼寫，進行了詞匯比較，規(guī)范了結構，明確了英文字詞的含義”。這部字典為后來的標準英語奠定了基礎，這一成就，用James Boswell的話說，就是“為英語的穩(wěn)定做出了貢獻”。
The Dictionary, together with his other writing, made Johnson famous and so well esteemed that his friends were able to prevail upon King George Ⅲ to offer him a pension. From then on, he was to become the Johnson of folklore.
約翰遜因為這部《字典》和其他一些作品而聞名于世并備受尊重，這使得他的朋友能夠說服國王喬治三世賞賜給他養(yǎng)老金。從那時起，他就成了家喻戶曉的約翰遜。
TEST 1 PASSAGE 2 參考譯文：
Nature or Nurture?
是先天本性還是后天控制?
A A few years ago, in one of the most fascinating and disturbing experiments in behavioural psychology, Stanley Milgram of Yale University tested 40 subjects from all walks of life for their willingness to obey instructions given by a ‘leader’ in a situation in which the subjects might feel a personal distaste for the actions they were called upon to perform. Specifically Milgram told each volunteer ‘teacher-subject’ that the experiment was in the noble cause of education, and was designed to test whether or not punishing pupils for their mistakes would have a positive effect on the pupils’ ability to learn.
A 幾年前，耶魯大學的Stanley Milgram進行了一項行為心理學試驗，這項試驗十分有趣但又令試驗對象深感不安。40名試驗對象分別來自社會各界。試驗要測試在對某領導命令做的事情可能產(chǎn)生反感的情況下，這些試驗對象是否愿意執(zhí)行命令。Milgram向每位在試驗中扮演教師角色的志愿者明確地解釋，試驗是為了崇高的教育事業(yè)而進行的，是要測試體罰犯錯誤的學生是否會對學生的學習能力產(chǎn)生積極的影響。
B Milgram’s experimental set-up involved placing the teacher-subject before a panel of thirty switches with labels ranging from ‘15 volts of electricity (slight shock)’ to ‘450 volts (danger — severe shock)’ in steps of 15 volts each. The teacher-subject was told that whenever the pupil gave the wrong answer to a question, a shock was to be administered, beginning at the lowest level and increasing in severity with each successive wrong answer. The supposed ‘pupil’ was in reality an actor hired by Milgram to simulate receiving the shocks by emitting a spectrum of groans, screams and writings together with an assortment of statements and expletives denouncing both the experiment and the experimenter. Milgram told the teacher-subject to ignore the reactions of the pupil, and to administer whatever level of shock was called for, as per the rule governing the experimental situation of the moment.
B Milgram的試驗方案是讓這些扮演教師角色的試驗對象到一個有30個切換開關的控電板前，開關上面分別貼著電壓標簽，從15伏(輕度電擊)開始，每個開關依次增大15伏，一直增大到450伏(危險的嚴重電擊)。然后告訴這些試驗對象，學生每回答錯一個問題，就施加一次電擊, 從最低電壓開始，隨著錯誤題數(shù)的增加，電擊強度也依次增加。試驗中的學生實際上是Mifgram雇傭的演員，他發(fā)出各種呻吟、叫喊聲并痛苦地扭動身體甚至用污言移語謾罵試驗者和試驗本身，來模擬出學生遭受電擊后的反應Milgram讓這些扮演教師角色的試驗對象不要理會學生的反應，按照控制試驗條件的規(guī)則，不管電壓多髙都要直接施加。
C As the experiment unfolded, the pupil would deliberately give the wrong answers to questions posed by the teacher, thereby bringing on various electrical punishments, even up to the danger level of 300 volts and beyond. Many of the teacher-subjects balked at administering the higher levels of punishment, and turned to Milgram with questioning looks and/or complaints about continuing the experiment. In these situations, Milgram calmly explained that the teacher-subject was to ignore the pupil’s cries for mercy and carry on with the experiment. If the subject was still reluctant to proceed, Milgram said that it was important for the sake of the experiment that the procedure be followed through to the end. His final argument was ‘you have no other choice. You must go on’. What Milgram was trying to discover was the number of teacher-subjects who would be willing to administer the highest levels of shock, even in the face of strong personal and moral revulsion against the rules and conditions of the experiment.
C 隨著試驗的展開，這個學生要故意答錯老師提出的問題，從而受到各種級別電擊的懲罰，甚至是高達300伏的危險電壓或更高電壓的電擊懲罰。許多扮演教師的試驗對象在實施高電壓懲罰時猶豫不決，面帶疑惑地看著Milgram或者對繼續(xù)試驗頗有微詞。一旦遇到這種情況，Milgram就會冷靜地向扮演教師的試驗對象解釋說，不要理會學生請求憐憫的呼喊，繼續(xù)試驗。如果試驗對象仍不肯繼續(xù)試驗，Milgram就告訴他們，為了完成試驗將試驗步驟進行到底是很重要的。如果這樣仍不奏效的話, Milgram就會說：“你別無選擇，必須繼續(xù)試驗?！盡ilgram想要找出的是，面對人性和道德對試驗規(guī)則和條件強烈的反感，有多少扮演教師的試驗對象會愿意施加最高電壓的電擊懲罰。
D Prior to carrying out the experiment, Milgram explained his idea to a group of 39 psychiatrists and asked them to predict the average percentage of people in an ordinary population who would be willing to administer the highest shock level of 450 volts. The overwhelming consensus was that virtually all the teacher-subjects would refuse to obey the experimenter. The psychiatrists felt that ‘most subjects would not go beyond 150 volts’ and they further anticipated that only four per cent would go up to 300 volts. Furthermore, they thought that only a lunatic fringe of about one in 1,000 would give the highest shock of 450 volts.
D 在進行試驗之前， Milgram向39名精神科醫(yī)生解釋了他的想法，讓他們預測一下普通人群中平均會有多大比例的人愿意施加最高達450伏的電擊。這些醫(yī)生幾乎一致認為差不多所有扮演教師的試驗對象都會拒絕遵從試驗人的命令。這些精神科醫(yī)生感到大多數(shù)扮演教師的試驗對象不會施加超過150伏電壓的電擊，并進一步預測說，只有4%的人會施力P300伏以上電壓的電擊。而且，他們認為只有約千分之一的像瘋子一樣的人才會施加450伏的電壓。
E What were the actual results? Well, over 60 per cent of the teacher-subjects continued to obey Milgram up to the 450-volt limit in repetitions of the experiment in other countries, the percentage of obedient teacher-subjects was even higher, reaching 85 per cent in one country. How can we possibly account for this vast discrepancy between what calm, rational, knowledgeable people predict in the comfort of their study and what pressured, flustered, but cooperative ‘teachers’ actually do in the laboratory of real life?
E 實際結果如何呢? 60%以上的扮演教師的試驗對象一直遵從Milgram的命令，直到施加最高電壓450伏的電擊。在其他國家進行的重復試驗中，愿意遵從命令的試驗對象的比例更髙, 在某個國家：甚至髙達85%。那些冷靜、理性、有學識的人們依靠他們的研究所得出的輕松的結論，與這些面臨壓力、緊張不安卻遵守命令的扮演教師的試驗對象在模擬真實生活的實驗室中的所作所為竟然存在這么大的差異，我們怎樣才能解釋這種差異呢?
F One’s first inclination might be to argue that there must be some sort of built-in animal aggression instinct that was activated by the experiment, and that Milgram’s teache-subjects were just following a genetic need to discharge this pent-up primal urge onto the pupil by administering the electrical shock. A modern hard-core sociobiologist might even go so far as to claim that this aggressive instinct evolved as an advantageous trait, having been of survival value to our ancestors in their struggle against the hardships of life on the plains and in the caves, ultimately finding its way into our genetic make-up as a remnant of our ancient animal ways.
F人們第一反應可能會說，一定是試驗激發(fā)了人內(nèi)在的某種侵略性動物本能。Milgram試驗中那些扮演教師的試驗對象正是本能地靠施加電擊來向?qū)W生發(fā)泄他們這種受到壓抑的原始沖動。典型的現(xiàn)代社會生物學家甚至會稱這種侵略性的本能是作為一種優(yōu)勢特征進化而來的，當我們的祖先在巖洞中和平原上與艱苦的生活作斗爭時，這種本能對他們的生存起到了重要的作用。因此，這種本能最終作為遠古時人類動物行為的遺留產(chǎn)物融人到我們的基因當中。
G An alternative to this notion of genetic programming is to see the teacher-subjects’ actions as a result of the social environment under which the experiment was carried out. As Milgram himself pointed out, ‘Most subjects in the experiment see their behaviour in a larger context that is benevolent and useful to society — the pursuit of scientific truth. The psychological laboratory has a strong claim to legitimacy and evokes trust and confidence in those who perform there. An action such as shocking a victim, which in isolation appears evil, acquires a completely different meaning when placed in this setting.’
G 與這種基因說不同的觀點是將那些扮演教師的試驗對象的行為看作是進行試驗的社會環(huán)境所造成的。正如Milgram自己所說：“大多數(shù)試驗對象從大的背景出發(fā)，認為自己的行為是仁慈的，對社會有益的，是在追求科學真理。心理實驗室又大力強調(diào)此舉的合法性，因此使試驗參與人員對其產(chǎn)生了信任和信心。像對受害人施加電擊這件事，單獨看來似乎是惡行，但在這種情況下卻有了完全不同的意義。”
H Thus, in this explanation the subject merges his unique personality and personal and moral code with that of larger institutional structures, surrendering individual properties like loyalty, self-sacrifice and discipline to the service of malevolent systems of authority.
H因此，按這種解釋，扮演教師的試驗對象是將自己的個性、個人準則和道德準則與更廣泛的體制結構結合了起來，使個人的一些特性，如忠誠、自我犧牲和遵守規(guī)定，為惡毒的權威體制服務。
I Here we have two radically different explanations for why so many teacher-subjects were willing to forgo their sense of personal responsibility for the sake of an institutional authority figure. The problem for biologists, psychologists and anthropologists is to sort out which of these two polar explanations is more plausible. This, in essence, is the problem of modern sociobiology — to discover the degree to which hard-wired genetic programming dictates, or at least strongly biases, the interaction of animals and humans with their environment, that is, their behaviour. Put another way, sociobiology is concerned with elucidating the biological basis of all behaviour.
I對于眾多扮演教師的試驗對象為了一個機構權威人物而愿意放棄他們個人責任感的這種行為，我們有兩種完全不同的解釋。生物學家、心理學家和人類學家所要解決的問題就是找出這兩種截然對立的解釋哪種更合理。從本質(zhì)講，這是一個當代社會生物學的問題一探索人自身相關基因組成能在多大程度上掌控，或至少說是強烈影響動物和人與環(huán)境的交互活動，即他們的行為。換句話說，社會生物學關注的是如何去闡釋所有行為的生物學基礎。
TEST 1 PASSAGE 3 參考譯文：
The Truth about the Environment
環(huán)境問題真相
For many environmentalists, the world seems to be getting worse. They have developed a hit-list of our main fears: that natural resources are running out; that the population is ever growing, leaving less and less to eat; that species are becoming extinct in vast numbers, and that the planet’s air and water are becoming ever more polluted.
在許多環(huán)境論者看來，我們的世界似乎變得越來越糟。他們列出了一系列我們擔憂的問題：自然資源正在枯竭，人口不斷增長，糧食越來越少，物種大批滅絕，地球的空氣污染和水污染越來越嚴重。
But a quick look at the facts shows a different picture. First, energy and other natural resources have become more abundant, not less so, since the book ‘The Limits to Growth’ was published in 1972 by a group of scientists. Second, more food is now produced per head of the world’s population than at any time in history. Fewer people are starving. Third, although species are indeed becoming extinct, only about 0.7% of them are expected to disappear in the next 50 years, not 25-50%, as has so often been predicted. And finally, most forms of environmental pollution either appear to have been exaggerated, or are transient — associated with the early phases of industrialisation and therefore best cured not by restricting economic growth, but by accelerating it. One form of pollution — the release of greenhouse gases that causes global warming — does appear to be a phenomenon that is going to extend well into our future, but its total impact is unlikely to pose a devastating problem. A bigger problem may well turn out to be an inappropriate response to it.
但我們只要簡單分析一下事實就會發(fā)現(xiàn)另外一種情況。首先，自1972年一組科學家出版了《增長的極限》這本書以來，能源和其他自然資源是變得越來越豐富了，而不是越來越少。其次，人均糧食產(chǎn)量比以往任何時候都要高，挨餓的人越來越少。第三，盡管物種的確在滅絕，但未來50年只會有0.7%的物種滅絕，而不是像人們通常所預計的25～50%。最后，大多數(shù)環(huán)境污染問題或者被夸大其詞或者只是暫時的，只是與工業(yè)化的早期階段相聯(lián)系的，因此解決這些污染問題的最佳方法不是限制經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展, 而是加速經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展。有一種污染，即由于排放溫室氣體所引起的全球變暖問題，似乎會在未來長期存在，但其總效應卻不大可能會帶來特別嚴重的問題。更大的問題反而可能出在應對措施不得力上。
Yet opinion polls suggest that many people nurture the belief that environmental standards are declining and four factors seem to cause this disjunction between perception and reality.
但是民意調(diào)査顯示，許多人所持的觀念認為環(huán)境質(zhì)量標準在下降，造成這種事實與人們觀念間的差異的原因大致有四個：
One is the lopsidedness built into scientific research. Scientific funding goes mainly to areas with many problems. That may be wise policy, but it will also create an impression that many more potential problems exist than is the case.
一是科學研究上的偏頗。科學基金主要投人到存在問題的領域。這似乎是一項明智的決策，但是這同樣也給人們造成了一種印象，似乎存在許多潛在的問題，而事實并非如此。
Secondly, environmental groups need to be noticed by the mass media. They also need to keep the money rolling in. Understandably, perhaps, they sometimes overstate their arguments. In 1997, for example, the World Wide Fund for Nature issued a press release entitled: ‘Two thirds of the world’s forests lost forever.’ The truth turns out to be nearer 20%.
第二，環(huán)保組織需要得到媒體的注意，也需要支持資金源源不斷地流入。因此對于這些團體有時會有夸大其詞的情況就不難理解了。比如說，1997年世界自然基金就發(fā)布一篇名為《世界森林2/3已不復存在》的新聞稿。而事實上世界森林只減少了20%左右。
Though these groups are run overwhelmingly by selfless folk, they nevertheless share many of the characteristics of other lobby groups. That would matter less if people applied the same degree of scepticism to environmental lobbying as they do to lobby groups in other fields. A trade organisation arguing for, say, weaker pollution controls is instantly seen as self-interested. Yet a green organisation opposing such a weakening is seen as altruistic, even if an impartial view of the controls in question might suggest they are doing more harm than good.
盡管這些組織絕大多數(shù)都是由無私的人們管理運營的，但他們和其他游說團體有許多共同之處。除非人們對待環(huán)境問題的游說活動也像對待其他問題的游說活動一樣，持同等的懷疑態(tài)度, 這種共同之處才不會發(fā)揮那么大的作用。比如說，一個貿(mào)易組織如果要求降低污染控制標準，這個組織馬上就會被認為是在謀私利。而即使對這一污染控制標準的客觀審視可能會證明環(huán)保組織反對這種污染控制的低標準是弊大于利，這個環(huán)保組織仍會被認為是無私的。
A third source of confusion is the attitude of the media. People are clearly more curious about bad news than good. Newspapers and broadcasters are there to provide what the public wants. That, however, can lead to significant distortions of perception. An example was America’s encounter with El Nino in 1997 and 1998. This climatic phenomenon was accused of wrecking tourism, causing allergies, melting the ski-slopes and causing 22 deaths. However, according to an article in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, the damage it did was estimated at US$4 billion but the benefits amounted to some US$19 billion. These came from higher winter temperatures (which saved an estimated 850 lives, reduced heating costs and diminished spring floods caused by meltwaters).
另一個使人們印象錯位的因素就是媒體的態(tài)度。顯然，人們對壞消息比對好消息更好奇。新聞和廣播就是要提供大眾所需要的東西。而這一點可能會導致人們認識上的巨大偏差J997年和1998年美國受到了厄爾尼諾現(xiàn)象的影響就是一個例子。人們責難這一氣候現(xiàn)象使旅游業(yè)陷于癱瘓，引起人們的過敏癥狀, 使一個滑雪坡融化造成22人死亡。盡管如此，美國氣象協(xié)會公告上的一篇文章卻認為, 盡管厄爾尼諾造成的損失估計有40億美元，但它帶來的收益卻髙達約190億美元。這主要得益于冬季氣溫的升髙，這種升溫拯救了大約850人的生命，降低了取暖費用，緩解了由于冰峰河流春季融化造成的春洪。
The fourth factor is poor individual perception. People worry that the endless rise in the amount of stuff everyone throws away will cause the world to run out of places to dispose of waste. Yet, even if America’s trash output continues to rise as it has done in the past, and even if the American population doubles by 2100, all the rubbish America produces through the entire 21st century will still take up only one-12,000th of the area of the entire United States.
第四個因素是個人見識的狹隘。人們擔心人均垃圾產(chǎn)生量的日益增多將使世界無處存放垃圾。但是，即使美國的垃圾產(chǎn)生量像以前那樣繼續(xù)增加，即使到2100年美國的人口加倍，全美國在整個21世紀產(chǎn)生的垃圾仍然僅會占到美國領土總面積的1/12,000。
So what of global warming? As we know, carbon dioxide emissions are causing the planet to warm. The best estimates are that the temperatures will rise by 2-3℃ in this century, causing considerable problems, at a total cost of US$5,000 billion.
那么全球變暖這一問題怎么樣呢?眾所周知，二氧化碳的排放導致地球變暖。據(jù)估計本世紀氣溫最髙會上升2～3℃，這將帶來嚴重的問題，造成5萬億美元的損失。
Despite the intuition that something drastic needs to be done about such a costly problem, economic analyses clearly show it will be far more expensive to cut carbon dioxide emissions radically than to pay the costs of adaptation to the increased temperatures. A model by one of the main authors of the United Nations Climate Change Panel shows how an expected temperature increase of 2.1 degrees in 2100 would only be diminished to an increase of 1.9 degrees. Or to put it another way, the temperature increase that the planet would have experienced in 2094 would be postponed to 2100.
盡管人們直覺上認為應當采取一些激進的措施，解決這一可能需要付出髙昂代價的問題，但是經(jīng)濟方面的分析表明，采取激進措施削減二氧化碳的排放量，將比采取措施適應溫度的上升付出更大的代價。聯(lián)合國氣候變化專家小組的一位主要成員所設計的一項模型表明, 如何將2100年時2.1度的氣溫上升減少到只上升1.9度。換句話說，2094年地球會出現(xiàn)的升溫推遲到2100年出現(xiàn)。
So this does not prevent global warming, but merely buys the world six years. Yet the cost of reducing carbon dioxide emissions, for the United States alone, will be higher than the cost of solving the world’s single, most pressing health problem: providing universal access to clean drinking water and sanitation. Such measures would avoid 2 million deaths every year, and prevent half a billion people from becoming seriously ill.
所以這并不會防止全球變暖，而只是給了世界6年的寬限期。但僅對美國而言，與解決人人都能獲得清潔的飲用水和衛(wèi)生設施這一世界上最緊迫的健康問題相比，減少二氧化碳排放量要付出更髙的代價。而解決了這一健康問題，毎年將可以避免200萬人死亡，防止5億人患上嚴重疾病。
It is crucial that we look at the facts if we want to make the best possible decisions for the future. It may be costly to be overly optimistic — but more costly still to be too pessimistic.
要做出有關未來的最佳決定就應當審視一下事實，這一點很關鍵。過度樂觀可能要付出代價，但過度悲觀則要付出更大的代價。
劍橋雅思閱讀5原文解析(test1)
Test 1 Passage1
Question 1-Question 3
答案：D E G
關鍵詞：Johnson’s Dictionary
定位原文：全文綜合信息處理
解題思路: A選項的all，B選項的only都太絕對了;C選項對應的原文在第4段第4句“Johnson decided…”原文都說了他不需要那么多人來確認語言問題的討論結果，和選項意思矛盾;D選項說約翰遜字典主要集中于當代文本中的語言，原文第6段第1句“Johnson wrote…”說的是drawn from the Elizabethans to his own time;意思一致;E選項和文中第6段第3句“Working to a deadline…”意思一致;G選項和第6段第5句意思一致;F選項和H選項的定位句分別在第6段“...he had to draw on the best of all previous dictionaries.”和第6段“He did not expect to achieve complete originality.”都與原文矛盾。
Question 4
答案：copying clerks或clerks
關鍵詞：1764/a number of/who stood at
定位原文: 第5段第1句“…with a long desk running down the middle”
解題思路: a number of要求其后填名詞復數(shù)形式，而此空后面的非限制性定語從句who又限定要填一個關于人的名詞。
Question 5
答案：library
關鍵詞：did not have a/40，000
定位原文: 第6段第1句“The work was immense：filling about eighty large…”
解題思路: 找到定位句后，很容易得到答案library。
Question 6
答案：stability
關鍵詞：James Boswell
定位原文: 第8段最后1句“… in James Boswell’s words...”
解題思路: 原文的conferred on 和 空處的bring to 屬于同義表達。
Question 7
答案：pension
關鍵詞：King
定位原文: 第9段1句“… King George III to offer him a pension”
解題思路: offer him a pension 和題目的 was granted a pension 屬于同義表達。
Question 8
答案：TRUE
關鍵詞: middle classes
定位原文: 第3段第1句“Beyond…”
解題思路: 題干中的growing跟increase對應這一句中的兩個rise，與原文意思一致。
Question 9
答案：FALSE
關鍵詞：Johnson/death
定位原文: 第3段第2句“...as famous in his own time as in ours...”
解題思路: 這句話表明他當時跟現(xiàn)代都享有盛譽，題干與原文矛盾。題干的 well known 為文章里這句話中的famous的同義替換。
Question 10
答案: NOT GIVEN
關鍵詞：several years
定位原文: 第4段內(nèi)容
解題思路: 按照判斷是非題的順序原則，這題在文章中的定位應該在第9題在文章中所定位的語句后面，同時又應該出現(xiàn)在第11題定位語句的前面，故應該從第3段末開始找一直到第4段中間，我們找不到任何跟題干相關的信息，故此題為not given。
Question 11
答案：FALSE
關鍵詞: academy
定位原文：第4段第4句“Johnson decided he did not need…”
解題思路: 這句話正說明約翰遜并未建立研究院來協(xié)助他完成字典的編纂。
Question 12
答案： FALSE
關鍵詞：payment
定位原文: 第4段最后1句“He was to be paid …”
解題思路: He was to be paid……installment對應,明確提到了得到分期付款，跟題干矛盾。
Question 13
答案： TRUE
關鍵詞：assistants/publication
定位原文: 第5段最后1句“He was also helped by six assistants…”
解題思路: 題干中的 not survive 跟文章中這句話的die對應，根據(jù)文意，題目表述是正確的。
Test 1 Passage 2
Question 14
答案：F
關鍵詞：biological explanation/teacher-subject
定位原文: F段第1句“…and that Milgram’s teacher-subjects were just following…”
解題思路: 文章F段第一句中genetic，built-in，instinct這些詞與題干中的biological explanation對應。
Question 15
答案：A
關鍵詞：explanation/for the experiment
定位原文: A段最后1句“Specifically…”
解題思路: 定位句中的短語in the cause of 即為題干explanation的同義替換。
Question 16
答案： B
關鍵詞：identity/pupil
定位原文: B段第3句“The supposed “pupil” was…”
解題思路: 找到對應句后很容易得出答案B。
Question 17
答案： D
關鍵詞：expected/statistical
定位原文: D段倒數(shù)第2句“The phychiatrists felt that “most subjects…”
解題思路: 定位到D段后，發(fā)現(xiàn)這些數(shù)字都是描述的實驗預期的結果。
Question 18
答案： I
關鍵詞：general aim/sociobiological study
定位原文: I段第3句“This, in essence, is…”
解題思路: 找到定位句后，比較容易得出答案。
Question 19
答案： C
關鍵詞：persuaded/continue
定位原文: C段第2、3、4句“Many of the teacher-subjects balked…”
解題思路: 注意go on即為 continue的同義替換。
Question 20
答案: B
關鍵詞：teacher-subjects were told...
定位原文: A段最后1句“Specifically, Milgram told each volunteer…”
解題思路: 定位句說得很清楚：Milgram向每位在試驗中扮演教師角色的志愿者明確地解釋，試驗是為了崇高的教育事業(yè)而進行的，是要測試體罰犯錯誤的學生是否會對學生的學習能力產(chǎn)生積極的影響。這就對應選項B。
Question 21
答案： D
關鍵詞：instructed to...
定位原文: B段最后1句“Milgram told the teacher-subject…”
解題思路: 其中的instructed跟文章中的told對應，按照控制試驗條件的規(guī)則，不管電壓多髙都要直接施加。
Question 22
答案： C
關鍵詞： phychiatrists
定位原文: D段第2句“The overwhelming consensus…”E段第1、2句“What were the actual results? Well, over 60 per…”
解題思路: 由這兩句話的反差可以看出，精神科醫(yī)生的確低估了試驗對象對規(guī)則的遵從程度，其中的be willing to 跟題干中的willingness屬于同義表達。
Question 23
答案：NOT GIVEN
關鍵詞：Yale University
定位原文: A段第1句“...Stanley Milgram of Yale University tested 40 subjects from…”
解題思路: all walks of life是社會各界的意思，我們并不能肯定試驗者就是來自耶魯大學的心理學學生。本題屬于典型的完全未提及型NOT GIVEN。
Question 24
答案：TRUE
關鍵詞：explain/survival mechanism
定位原文: F段第2句“A modem hard-core sociobiologist might…”
解題思路: 定位句中的advantageous trait 與題干中的positive survival mechanism 屬于同義表達。
Question 25
答案：FALSE
關鍵詞：sociobiological explanation
定位原文: H段內(nèi)容和I段第1句“Here we have two radically different…”
解題思路: 定位句的兩句話都在體現(xiàn)出個人價值觀在被權威所統(tǒng)治。
Question 26
答案：FALSE
關鍵詞：sociobiology
定位原文: I段整個段落內(nèi)容
解題思路: 我們在文章最后一段可以得知Milgram的實驗并未解決社會生物學上的這個重大問題，只不過是證明了這個問題的存在。
Test 1 Passage 3
Question 27
答案：YES
關鍵詞：environmentalists
定位原文: 第1段第1、2句 “For many…”
解題思路: hit-list重要事件的列表，按計劃迸行殺害的名單。在這里應該理解為一系列。
Question 28
答案： NOT GIVEN
關鍵詞：1972, only
定位原文: 第2段第2句“...“the Limits to Growth”was published in 1972…”
解題思路: 1972年這個信息只在上面這句話中出現(xiàn)，而按照順序解題原則，這道題目的答案只能在第二段中尋找，實際上該段并未提到任何關于資料搜集開始時間的信息。所以這是一道典型的NOT GIVEN。
Question 29
答案： NO
關鍵詞： starving people
定位原文: 第2段第3句“Fewer people are starving…”
解題思路: 這句話意思非常明確了，和題目表述矛盾。
Question 30
答案： NOT GIVEN
關鍵詞： species
定位原文: 第2段第5句話“Third, although species are indeed…”
解題思路: 這一句雖然提到了物種，但是并沒有提到題目中論述的那個話題。而且，題目其實也是在變相地將新舊物種比較，屬于并不存在的比較關系，因此應選擇NOT GIVEN。
Question 31
答案： YES
關鍵詞： industrialisation
定位原文: 第2段第6句“And finally, most forms…”
解題思路: 這句話說明工業(yè)化早期的確引起了一些污染問題，，故此題選YES。
Question 32
答案： NO
關鍵詞： economic growth/best
定位原文: 第2段第6句“...and therefore best cured not by restricting…”
解題思路: 文中已經(jīng)明確提到控制污染的最好方式不是減慢經(jīng)濟發(fā)展速度，而是加速經(jīng)濟發(fā)展。
Question 33
答案： C
關鍵詞：paragraph 4
定位原文: 第4段第2句“Scientific funding goes mainly…”
解題思路: 題目問的是作者提出了對哪個科研領域的關注，定位句明確說明這同樣也給人們造成了一種印象，似乎存在許多潛在的問題，而事實并非如此，言下之意就是要確認好對研究領域的選擇，C選項符合。
Question 34
答案： D
關鍵詞：Worldwide Fund for Nature
定位原文: 第5段第3句“Understandably, perhaps, they sometimes…”
解題思路: 定位句明確說明也許有時候他們夸張了事實，選項D符合。
Question 35
答案： C
關鍵詞：paragraph 6
定位原文：第6段第2句“That would matter less if…”
解題思路：題目問的是作者對游說團體的看法，C選項和原文表述一致。
Question 36
答案： B
關鍵詞：newspaper print
定位原文: 第7段第3句“Newspaper and broadcasters…”
解題思路: 定位句說報紙和廣播應該提供給公眾所需要的，選項B滿足讀者需求，和原文表述一致。
Question 37
答案： B
關鍵詞：America
定位原文: 第8段第3句“Yet, even if…”
解題思路: 題目問的是作者對美國垃圾問題的觀點是什么，定位句說即便垃圾持續(xù)增長，人口增長，整個21世紀美國產(chǎn)生的垃圾只占整個美國面積的12萬分之一，言下之意，就是B選項：垃圾問題沒有我們想象的嚴重。
Question 38
答案： E. long-term
關鍵詞： global warming/a
定位原文: 文章中最后4段內(nèi)容
解題思路:這里應該填一個表示正面惑情色彩的形容詞，而且這個詞要可以和challenge搭配。那么選擇范圍就縮小到了agreed/right/long-term/surprising/urgent五個詞上，,然后再根據(jù)后半句but來判斷，,作者對全球變暖問題的態(tài)度是樂觀的，顯然應該是一個與catastrophic相反的詞，因此范圍最終縮小到了long-term。
Question 39
答案： D. right
關鍵詞：way
定位原文: 文章最后4段內(nèi)容
解題思路: 要和way來搭配，修飾way。按照題目中句子的含義來說，就是說以一個比較好的，合理的處理方法，就不會有災難性的影響，只有right是最符合的。
Question 40
答案： I. urgent
關鍵詞: health problem
定位原文: 倒數(shù)第2段第2句“…most pressing…”
解題思路: 這句話中的most pressing指最急迫的，最迫切的，正好和詞庫中的urgent相對應，屬于同義表達。
劍橋雅思閱讀5原文翻譯及答案(test1)相關文章：