雅思寫(xiě)作法律犯罪類(lèi)題目解析

時(shí)間：2024-03-22 06:37:18 楚薇20由分享

　雅思寫(xiě)作遇到法律犯罪類(lèi)的題目該怎么解答，下面小編給大家整理了該題目的解析大全，希望對(duì)你們有所幫助。

雅思寫(xiě)作典型法律犯罪題目講解

　　A類(lèi)的雅思大作文大致可以分為教育，社會(huì)，科技，政府政策，大眾媒體，法律和犯罪這么六大類(lèi)的題目，而其中學(xué)生們普遍反映最怵的，感覺(jué)最無(wú)從下手的題目當(dāng)屬法律與犯罪類(lèi)型的題目。截至到08年12月22日為止，在1月12日，8月16日以及10月11日的考試均出現(xiàn)了法律，犯罪的題目。雖然說(shuō)出題頻率相對(duì)來(lái)說(shuō)并不是非常的頻繁，但是如果學(xué)生在備考中沒(méi)有進(jìn)行合理有效的對(duì)此類(lèi)話(huà)題具有針對(duì)性的總結(jié)和復(fù)習(xí)的話(huà)，相信很難在寫(xiě)作中取得什么理想的分?jǐn)?shù)(參加了這幾次考試中的學(xué)員的分?jǐn)?shù)普遍不是非常的理想)。而縱觀市面上大量的雅思寫(xiě)作指導(dǎo)，烤鴨備考秘笈這些針對(duì)不同層次，不同水平的學(xué)生而編輯的雅思叢書(shū)中，我們也很難看到針對(duì)犯罪這類(lèi)題目的一些教學(xué)及復(fù)習(xí)指導(dǎo)。在此篇論文中，我將就法律與犯罪所涉及的一些常見(jiàn)話(huà)題給大家從其內(nèi)容，語(yǔ)言逐一進(jìn)行分析，希望雅思教師們或者烤鴨們能夠從中受益。

　　1. Can capital punishment (death penalty) ever be justified?

　　是否應(yīng)該有死刑?

　　這個(gè)題目可以說(shuō)是一談到法律犯罪這一大類(lèi)話(huà)題時(shí)，最會(huì)經(jīng)常談到的問(wèn)題。對(duì)于大多數(shù)中國(guó)雅思考生，尤其是高中生，大學(xué)生，如果沒(méi)有事先經(jīng)過(guò)精心準(zhǔn)備的話(huà)，對(duì)這個(gè)題目恐怕只能是傻眼了。關(guān)于這個(gè)話(huà)題，大致可以分成以下這幾個(gè)分論點(diǎn)來(lái)展開(kāi)：

　　Arguments against capital punishment

　　1. 死刑只是對(duì)罪犯的一種處罰，而并不能夠?qū)⒎缸镄袨橹惺芎φ呱旎?，或者賠償其所遭受的傷害

　　Capital punishment, which even though manages to bring the criminals to justice, could by no means compensate for physical, mental and psychological sufferings inflicted on victims, or in some extreme cases, bring back their lives.

　　2. 無(wú)論一個(gè)人犯多大的錯(cuò)誤，其他人都無(wú)權(quán)剝奪其生命。 (人權(quán))

　　It is entirely unjustified to deprive one of his/her rights to live regardless of how insanely severe and cruel the offenses he/she has committed are. (This subject matter has boiled to the controversial issue of human rights)

　　3. 死刑犯的尸體的處理(是否可以用于器官移植等等)將是一個(gè)非常具有爭(zhēng)議的道德問(wèn)題。

　　How the body of the deceased criminal is going to be disposed of (used for organ transplant, for instance) will be bound to raise grave both ethical and social implications.

　　Arguments for capital punishment

　　1. 如果死刑犯沒(méi)有受到最為嚴(yán)厲的懲罰，那么這對(duì)受害者是不公平的。

　　It would be only fair for the victims if the criminals are subject to the greatest fear of all- death.

　　2. 如果死刑取消的話(huà)，那么很多潛在的罪犯就不會(huì)顧忌做出一些極為可怕的犯罪行為。

　　If capital punishment is ever to be done away with, the potential wrong-doers wouldn’t be deterred from committing staggeringly serious offenses among which serial murder proves particularly appalling.

　　2. Should criminals be sent to prisons or placed on education and job retraining?

　　類(lèi)似的題目之前曾經(jīng)考過(guò)，而在今年的1月12日再次出現(xiàn)。對(duì)于這個(gè)題目，很多學(xué)生會(huì)非常容易的陷入一個(gè)陷阱(pitfall)，那就是認(rèn)為說(shuō)如果讓學(xué)生接受教育或就業(yè)培訓(xùn)的話(huà)，那就是等同于有充分的人身自由了。其實(shí)不然，這里的教育或就業(yè)培訓(xùn)并不代表說(shuō)把囚犯與普通的學(xué)生或接受培訓(xùn)者一樣等同的對(duì)待，而是一樣的要限制他們的自由，只不過(guò)說(shuō)不像在監(jiān)獄里整天關(guān)在牢房里無(wú)所事事，而是要接受教育和培訓(xùn)。關(guān)于這個(gè)題目，其實(shí)就變成了一個(gè)兩者之間的對(duì)比，可以從以下幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行論述。

　　1. 監(jiān)獄同教育或就業(yè)培訓(xùn)相比有很強(qiáng)的阻嚇作用，這樣可以有效的抑制犯罪率的上升。

　　In stark contrast to placing criminals on educational courses or employment retraining, prisons appeared more effective in deterring potential, would-be wrongdoers from committing crimes, thus drastically decreasing the likelihood of rising crime rate.

　　2. 監(jiān)獄更多的對(duì)罪犯來(lái)說(shuō)是一種懲罰，因此能夠避免再犯。

　　Being locked up behind the bars is a punitive measure imposed on criminals who are highly unlikely to turn into a recidivist in consideration of their fear of setting foot into jails ever again.

　　Arguments for education and job retraining

　　1. 罪犯在監(jiān)獄里所被包圍的是一群囚犯，這對(duì)罪犯的改造不是好的，反而是不好的影響。接受教育可以讓罪犯在一個(gè)積極的環(huán)境里，真正的意識(shí)到對(duì)與錯(cuò)。

　　“Captivity of negativity” is a terminology intended to describe the destructive, rather than constructive impact on criminals who are locked up in prison, surrounded by people who probably have committed even more serious charges. Education serves to correct any misconception or eliminate twisted thoughts they have by immersing them in a positive environment.

　　2. 大多數(shù)罪犯往往是沒(méi)有什么文化知識(shí)和生存技能，出獄后通常很難找到工作。教育和就業(yè)培訓(xùn)能夠讓他們?cè)谌蘸蟮纳钪锌孔约荷嫦氯?，而不至于因?yàn)闆](méi)有收入來(lái)源而再次誤入歧途。

　　A significant proportion of criminals are sadly illiterate without adequate fundamental knowledge and survival skills and it wouldn’t be easy for them to find a decent job after being released from the jail. With convenient access to education and job retraining, they are able to survive by themselves, greatly reducing the chance of becoming a recidivist in times when they are financially challenged.

　　3. Should individual choices interfere with the society that is based on rules and laws

　　這是今年10月11號(hào)的考題，這道題目主要討論的核心是一種矛盾。那就是社會(huì)始終是以法規(guī)和法律為基礎(chǔ)的，而有時(shí)社會(huì)的利益往往是與個(gè)人的選擇相矛盾的。當(dāng)這種矛盾發(fā)生時(shí)，應(yīng)該將哪一個(gè)放在首位?為什么?這次考試結(jié)束后，我曾經(jīng)與幾個(gè)參與考試的學(xué)生討論過(guò)，很多學(xué)生的反映就是這個(gè)題目其實(shí)并不難，但就是不知道怎樣下手。還有某位學(xué)生直接就舉了一個(gè)我們不能隨便殺人，因?yàn)檫@是違反法律的事情的這樣一個(gè)例子。其實(shí)，這個(gè)題目最為關(guān)鍵的是兩點(diǎn)：怎樣去法律的范圍還有就是要找到一個(gè)合適法律與個(gè)人選擇發(fā)生沖突的這么一個(gè)結(jié)合點(diǎn)。我對(duì)這個(gè)題目的段落結(jié)構(gòu)以及內(nèi)容的理解如下：

　　1.這種矛盾的產(chǎn)生主要是因?yàn)榉煞ㄒ?guī)是從大眾和國(guó)家的利益出發(fā)，而個(gè)人利益則絕大多數(shù)情況下是站在個(gè)人角度考慮問(wèn)題的。一個(gè)有利于個(gè)人的問(wèn)題如果給其他人造成了無(wú)謂的傷害，則是不應(yīng)該允許的。

　　The conflict of public interest and personal interest accounts largely for the issue of the extent to which is the interference of personal choices justified with the society governed by rules and laws.

　　這里我們可以舉一個(gè)例子，就知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)(Intellectual Property Rights).很多人都會(huì)去網(wǎng)絡(luò)上下載免費(fèi)電影，音樂(lè)以及電子書(shū)。這樣做的原因就是正版(authentic copy)相對(duì)中國(guó)消費(fèi)者來(lái)說(shuō)太貴。雖然說(shuō)這看起來(lái)合情合理，大多數(shù)人都會(huì)從中受益，但是這也同時(shí)傷害到了娛樂(lè)明星們(celebrities)和唱片公司的利益，所以這時(shí)候應(yīng)該以法律為根本，杜絕這種行為。

　　2.反過(guò)來(lái)說(shuō)，我們不可否認(rèn)個(gè)別特別情況下法律也應(yīng)該給正當(dāng)?shù)膫€(gè)人選擇讓步

　　On the other hand, rules and laws should give in to personal choices in some special cases.

　　比如說(shuō)，開(kāi)車(chē)送心臟病突然發(fā)作的人趕往醫(yī)院。盡管說(shuō)途中司機(jī)可能會(huì)闖紅燈(run red lights，會(huì)造成一定的交通混亂，甚至說(shuō)還有發(fā)生交通事故的可能。但是這樣一種行為我認(rèn)為應(yīng)該被理解(tolerated). 這是出于法律之外的，但是又合乎情理的。當(dāng)然，這種法律的讓步是有限的，很多時(shí)候確實(shí)很難判斷。所以，無(wú)論是法律還是個(gè)人選擇，最終都是從應(yīng)該是整體的利益出發(fā).

　　以上就是我對(duì)三個(gè)比較典型的法律犯罪類(lèi)的題目的講解，希望能夠幫助到在緊張備考雅思的考生們。

　　雅思大作文解析及范文：社會(huì)法律規(guī)范是否該遵守

　　Task:Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　思路解析：

　　應(yīng)該遵守：法律和法規(guī)是社會(huì)有序運(yùn)行的前提，它們規(guī)范了人們的行為和思想，讓人們的活動(dòng)能限制在一個(gè)安全的，合法的范圍。相反，一旦人們恣意妄為地來(lái)忽略這些法律的話(huà)，整個(gè)社會(huì)會(huì)陷入混亂。舉例，如果交通法規(guī)不被遵守，則會(huì)出現(xiàn)大量的車(chē)禍。如果刑法不被遵守的話(huà)，則會(huì)出現(xiàn)大量的社會(huì)犯罪。

　　不應(yīng)該遵守：對(duì)于那些不公正的法律，人們應(yīng)該被授予足夠的自由來(lái)進(jìn)行對(duì)抗。舉例，如果美國(guó)今天仍然保留著奴隸法案的話(huà)，則今天的美國(guó)黑人將處境悲慘，沒(méi)有教育，醫(yī)療，工作和投票的權(quán)利?？梢钥吹?，這樣的法律必將引發(fā)來(lái)自黑人的憤怒，反抗，甚至是戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)。

　　參考范文：

　　Nowadays, there is an assertion that the freedom of citizens should be limited; otherwise it might harm the social laws and justice system, thus making our society unstable. Personally, this view is psychologically right, while it overlooks the importance of fighting against the unfair laws freely.

　　Firstly, there is no doubt that obeying social rules and laws is the fundamental obligation for all individuals, for the reason that they serve as a key function of ensuring our society running on the right track. Obviously, these regulations define the borders between the right and the wrong, the social ethics and day-to-day conduct standards, all of which can instruct and regulate citizens to act and think in a lawful, polite and safe way. Otherwise, the ignorance of these regulations, or so-called “an absolute freedom”, will trap our society into chaos and even malfunction. For example, if the traffic laws were disrespected, it is expected that all streets and highways will be full of congestions and car crashes caused by wrongdoings in driving like blind over speed or overtaking. Similarly, if the criminal law were absent, then there will be no concern of punishments for committing crimes. Consequently, illegal activities including thefts, robberies, arson, rapes, vandalism and murders will be overwhelming, which will not only place the poverties and lives of the public in the danger, but also destroy today’s civilization in a long term.

　　However, there is always a justification that people should be allowed to freely question and topple those unfair laws that are the barriers of democracy development. In history, the typical example is the slavery law in America that defined African-Americans as second-class citizens and deprived their rights of public education, health care and vote. If this evil law were just followed, instead of being eradicated through the pursuit of human freedom, we now can predict clearly that current the community of America would be still full of inequity, discrimination, and massive social disorder caused by conflicts between the black and white.

　　All in all, I agree that it is very necessary to limit the freedom of the public by confining their behaviors in the bounds of social regulation and laws, which is the pre-condition of social democracy and stability. However, when it comes to unjust laws, the public should have the freedom to eliminate them.

　　(392 words)

　　雅思寫(xiě)作重點(diǎn)題目總結(jié)：犯罪與法律類(lèi)

　　1. 青少年犯罪

　　母題：In many parts of the world children and teenagers are committing more crimes. Why is this case happening? How should children or teenagers be punished? (100804)

　　提示：青少年犯罪juvenile delinquency 產(chǎn)生的原因及其解決方法?？蓮募彝?、社會(huì)、媒體三個(gè)角度分析。

　　子題：很多年輕人有一種反社會(huì)行為，原因是什么，如何解決?犯罪是人類(lèi)本性，還是可以預(yù)防的?

　　2. 犯罪預(yù)防

　　母題：Unlike in most other countries, police in the UK do not commonly carry guns. Some people think it leaves citizens unprotected. But others think it reduces the overall violence in our society. Discuss both sides of the view and give your opinion. (040320, 040619)

　　提示：這道題目當(dāng)之無(wú)愧地成為母題，因?yàn)檫@道話(huà)題自從2010年9月起已經(jīng)成為了雅思口語(yǔ)話(huà)題中的題目。11年8月20日，這道題目以變題的形式再一次出現(xiàn)在雅思寫(xiě)作中。

　　子題：是否應(yīng)該嚴(yán)懲違反交規(guī)者?城市中采取預(yù)防犯罪的措施，利大于弊嗎?個(gè)人如果為所欲為，社會(huì)就無(wú)法運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)，你同意嗎?犯罪是世界問(wèn)題，無(wú)法預(yù)防，你同意嗎?

　　3. 罪犯懲處

　　母題：Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are better ways to help them. Do you agree or disagree? (050618, 080918)

　　提示：其實(shí)囚禁imprisonment和再教育都是一種讓囚犯改造rehabilitate的方法。還有community service對(duì)于輕犯和初犯都是一種不錯(cuò)的懲處方式。

　　子題：監(jiān)獄除了懲罰犯罪，還有什么功能?降低犯罪的最佳方法是延長(zhǎng)監(jiān)獄星期嗎?刑滿(mǎn)釋放人員再犯罪率很高，為什么，如何解決?你認(rèn)為罪犯應(yīng)該送到監(jiān)獄還是應(yīng)該做一些社區(qū)工作或?qū)W習(xí)一些技能?

　　雅思寫(xiě)作高難詞匯整理：法律專(zhuān)集

　　犯罪/違反法律:commit a crime , break the law,

　　law breaking, violate the law, against the law,

　　罪犯: criminal, law offender, law breaker,

　　law violator, villain, vermin, convict

　　守法: abide by the law, comply, compliance with the law,

　　conform. to the law, abidance by law, keep the law

　　濫用法律: abuse of law, stretch the law

　　監(jiān)獄/關(guān)押:jail, prison, imprisonment, imprison, incarcerate, lock up

　　死刑: capital punishment, death penalty, death sentence

　　無(wú)期徒刑: life sentence, life prisonment, lifelong punishment

　　受害者: victim, casualty